Why Scientific Uncertainty Does Not Prevent Legal Conclusions
When it comes to civil claims, the court works on the balance of probabilities rather than the criminal standard of proof. A judge does not need scientific certainty in order to reach a conclusion, and the court must decide what is more likely than not based on the evidence available.
When Changing Your Expert Opinion Becomes a Risk: Reflections on Andrews v Kronospan Limited [2025]
One of the most difficult positions an expert witness can find themselves in is this: you have completed your analysis, agreed a common approach with the opposing experts, and the results are not what your instructing party hoped for.