There is an assumption that aesthetic treatment claims arise only due to the fact that a procedure has been performed poorly, but in reality, the factors involved are frequently more complex.

Recurring themes seen in medico-legal reviews offer valuable insight into clinical practice and highlight the importance of the decisions made throughout the patient journey.

Patients frequently arrive at consultations with very clear ideas about what they want, how the result should look, and how quickly it should be achieved. Those ideas are often shaped by social media, long before they speak to a qualified practitioner.

From time to time, I come across discussions in mainstream medical law that feel particularly relevant to the medical aesthetic practice. Recently, I listened to a legal conversation in Episode 204 of Law Pod UK centred on causation in clinical negligence and the evolving approach to informed consent.

Julie’s latest article featured in the June 2025 edition of the Expert Witness Journal. An in-depth look at the growing issue of personal injury in non-surgical aesthetic medicine, exploring legal risks, clinical failings, and the urgent need for reform.