When it comes to civil claims, the court works on the balance of probabilities rather than the criminal standard of proof. A judge does not need scientific certainty in order to reach a conclusion, and the court must decide what is more likely than not based on the evidence available. 

From time to time, I come across discussions in mainstream medical law that feel particularly relevant to the medical aesthetic practice. Recently, I listened to a legal conversation in Episode 204 of Law Pod UK centred on causation in clinical negligence and the evolving approach to informed consent.

In my latest blog, I’m sharing what I’ve learned from years of reviewing aesthetic negligence cases, and why sticking to an agreed plan is a safeguard for everyone involved.